Former U.S. President Donald Trump has made a controversial proposal suggesting that the United States should reclaim control of the Panama Canal. Speaking at a recent event, Trump cited strategic concerns over China’s influence in the region as a reason to revisit the 1977 treaty that transferred control of the canal to Panama. The remarks have sparked intense debate, with experts weighing in on the feasibility and geopolitical implications of such a move.

Trump’s Remarks on the Panama Canal

During his address, Trump labeled the 1999 handover of the Panama Canal as a “historical blunder” that compromised U.S. national security.

“We built it, we paid for it, and we gave it away. That canal is critical for our national defense, and it’s being exploited by China,” Trump asserted.

The former president did not specify how the U.S. might regain control but framed the issue as a matter of protecting American interests in the face of China’s expanding global influence.

Historical Context: The Transfer of the Panama Canal

The Panama Canal, completed in 1914, was under U.S. control until December 31, 1999, when it was transferred to Panama under the terms of the 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaties. The treaties were signed to resolve long-standing tensions between Panama and the U.S. over sovereignty and control of the canal.

Key Historical Points

• Construction and Control: The canal was constructed by the U.S. after the French failed to complete the project. It became a vital asset for global trade and U.S. military strategy.
• The Handover: President Jimmy Carter negotiated the treaties with Panamanian leader Omar Torrijos, ensuring that Panama would assume full control by the end of the century.

While the transition was peaceful, it has remained a point of contention among some American political figures, particularly conservatives who argue the canal is too strategically important to be relinquished.

China’s Growing Role in the Panama Canal

China has invested heavily in Panama and surrounding regions, sparking concerns about its strategic intentions. Companies like China COSCO Shipping and Hutchison Ports have a significant presence in canal operations and nearby port facilities.

Key Concerns Raised by Trump and Analysts

1. Strategic Control: Critics argue that Chinese influence over Panama could potentially threaten U.S. military and trade operations reliant on the canal.
2. Economic Leverage: China’s Belt and Road Initiative has extended to Latin America, making Panama a key partner in its global economic strategy.
3. Security Risks: Some defense analysts warn that Chinese investments in infrastructure near the canal could enable surveillance or limit access to U.S. assets during conflicts.

Panama’s Perspective

Panama has emphasized its neutrality in managing the canal, asserting that it remains open to all nations under international agreements. Panamanian officials have also highlighted the economic benefits they have reaped since gaining control, including significant revenue generation from canal tolls.

Panama’s Response to Trump’s Comments

Though Panamanian leaders have not officially responded to Trump’s recent remarks, previous calls by U.S. politicians to revisit the canal’s status have been met with firm resistance. Panamanian officials have consistently defended their sovereignty and the efficient management of the canal under their leadership.

U.S. Public and Political Reactions

Trump’s remarks have sparked divided opinions across the political spectrum.

Supporters’ Views:

• Strategic Importance: Proponents argue that the U.S. should reassess its role in the canal to counter China’s growing influence.
• National Security: Some conservatives view Trump’s suggestion as a necessary step to protect vital trade routes and U.S. military interests.

Critics’ Views:

• Feasibility: Many experts argue that attempting to reclaim the canal would severely damage U.S.-Panama relations and breach international law.
• Diplomatic Fallout: Critics warn that such a move could isolate the U.S. on the global stage, further straining relations with Latin American allies.

Legal and Diplomatic Challenges

Reclaiming the Panama Canal would present numerous legal and diplomatic hurdles. The Torrijos-Carter Treaties are internationally recognized, and any unilateral attempt to undermine them could provoke condemnation from the global community.

Potential Ramifications:

1. Breach of International Law: Violating the treaty could set a dangerous precedent, undermining the credibility of U.S. agreements.
2. Strained Latin American Relations: Such a move could alienate key allies in the Western Hemisphere.
3. Economic Backlash: Panama could respond with measures to limit U.S. access to the canal, disrupting trade and military logistics.

Geopolitical Implications

Trump’s proposal comes amid heightened global tensions, particularly between the U.S. and China. The Red Sea, South China Sea, and Latin America are becoming focal points for strategic competition. The Panama Canal’s strategic significance makes it a potential flashpoint in this broader rivalry.

Expert Opinions

Military Analysts

Defense experts note that while the canal remains strategically important, the U.S. military has adapted to global operations that rely less on fixed assets like the canal.

Trade Economists

Economists argue that while the canal is vital for global trade, any disruption to its operations would harm all nations, including the U.S., more than it would provide strategic advantage.

Diplomatic Experts

Seasoned diplomats emphasize that any attempt to reclaim the canal would likely erode trust in U.S. leadership and harm relations with Latin American countries.

Trump’s proposal to retake control of the Panama Canal has reignited debates about the U.S.’s role in global strategic infrastructure. While the canal’s importance cannot be understated, the feasibility of reclaiming it under international law and current geopolitical conditions remains highly contentious. As the U.S. navigates its competition with China, maintaining strong diplomatic ties with Panama and other allies will be critical in securing its interests in the region.